Difference between revisions of "Resource:Seminar"

From MobiNetS
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
{{SemNote
{{SemNote
|time='''2022-5-23 10:30'''
|time='''2022-5-30 10:30'''
|addr=4th Research Building A527-B
|addr=4th Research Building A527-B
|note=Useful links: [[Resource:Reading_List|Readling list]]; [[Resource:Seminar_schedules|Schedules]]; [[Resource:Previous_Seminars|Previous seminars]].
|note=Useful links: [[Resource:Reading_List|Readling list]]; [[Resource:Seminar_schedules|Schedules]]; [[Resource:Previous_Seminars|Previous seminars]].

Revision as of 22:28, 29 May 2022

Time: 2022-5-30 10:30
Address: 4th Research Building A527-B
Useful links: Readling list; Schedules; Previous seminars.

Latest

  1. [SenSys 2021] Mercury: Efficient On-Device Distributed DNN Training via Stochastic Importance Sampling, Jiajun
    Abstract: As intelligence is moving from data centers to the edges, intelligent edge devices such as smartphones, drones, robots, and smart IoT devices are equipped with the capability to altogether train a deep learning model on the devices from the data collected by themselves. Despite its considerable value, the key bottleneck of making on-device distributed training practically useful in realworld deployments is that they consume a significant amount of training time under wireless networks with constrained bandwidth. To tackle this critical bottleneck, we present Mercury, an importance sampling-based framework that enhances the training efficiency of on-device distributed training without compromising the accuracies of the trained models. The key idea behind the design of Mercury is to focus on samples that provide more important information in each training iteration. In doing this, the training efficiency of each iteration is improved. As such, the total number of iterations can be considerably reduced so as to speed up the overall training process. We implemented Mercury and deployed it on a self-developed testbed. We demonstrate its effectiveness and show that Mercury consistently outperforms two status quo frameworks on six commonly used datasets across tasks in image classification, speech recognition, and natural language processing.
  2. [ATC 2020] Disaggregating Persistent Memory and Controlling Them Remotely: An Exploration of Passive Disaggregated Key-Value Stores, Qinyong
    Abstract: Many datacenters and clouds manage storage systems separately from computing services for better manageability and resource utilization. These existing disaggregated storage systems use hard disks or SSDs as storage media. Recently, the technology of persistent memory (PM) has matured and seen initial adoption in several datacenters. Disaggregating PM could enjoy the same benefits of traditional disaggregated storage systems, but it requires new designs because of its memory-like performance and byte addressability. In this paper, we explore the design of disaggregating PM and managing them remotely from compute servers, a model we call passive disaggregated persistent memory, or pDPM. Compared to the alternative of managing PM at storage servers, pDPM significantly lowers monetary and energy costs and avoids scalability bottlenecks at storage servers. We built three key-value store systems using the pDPM model. The first one lets all compute nodes directly access and manage storage nodes. The second uses a central coordinator to orchestrate the communication between compute and storage nodes. These two systems have various performance and scalability limitations. To solve these problems, we built Clover, a pDPM system that separates the location, communication mechanism, and management strategy of the data plane and the metadata/control plane. Compute nodes access storage nodes directly for data operations, while one or few global metadata servers handle all metadata/control operations. From our extensive evaluation of the three pDPM systems, we found Clover to be the best-performing pDPM system. Its performance under common datacenter workloads is similar to non-pDPM remote in-memory key-value store, while reducing CapEx and OpEx by 1.4× and 3.9×.


History

History

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

  • [Topic] [ The path planning algorithm for multiple mobile edge servers in EdgeGO], Rong Cong, 2020-11-18

2019

2018

2017

Template loop detected: Resource:Previous Seminars

Instructions

请使用Latest_seminar和Hist_seminar模板更新本页信息.

    • 修改时间和地点信息
    • 将当前latest seminar部分的code复制到这个页面
    • 将{{Latest_seminar... 修改为 {{Hist_seminar...,并增加对应的日期信息|date=
    • 填入latest seminar各字段信息
    • link请务必不要留空,如果没有link则填本页地址 https://mobinets.org/index.php?title=Resource:Seminar
  • 格式说明
    • Latest_seminar:

{{Latest_seminar
|confname=
|link=
|title=
|speaker=
}}

    • Hist_seminar

{{Hist_seminar
|confname=
|link=
|title=
|speaker=
|date=
}}